The Stanley #29 |
Stamp on the toe |
Casting on wood body |
The knob is screwed directly into the wooden body through a hole in the casting.
Knob |
Tote |
Tote securing rod |
Iron assembly |
Frog screwed down |
Frog unscrewed |
Another very interesting thing about this depth adjuster knob - it has a right hand thread, as opposed to the adjuster on every metal plane I've ever used. So to advance the iron, you turn the adjuster counter-clockwise.
In trying to date this plane, I came across a post on the Time Tested Tools website entitled "Roger K. Smith's Stanley Transitional Type Study". Near as I can tell, my plane is a type 9, produced between 1888 and 1892. This plane has right hand threads for the depth adjuster and the type study said that a left hand thread began with type 10. Also, the trademark stamped on the toe started with type 8. My lateral adjust lever is equipped with a round disc and that started with type 9.
One thing complicating this is that there is no marking on the iron whatsoever. No "Stanley", no "Stanley Rule & Level Co.", nothing. Maybe it's a replacement iron. There are also no patent dates on the lateral adjustment lever and there are supposed to be three for a type 9. The lever also has a double bend in it just above where the iron ends so that it can more easily clear the top of the tote (see the picture of the tote above).
There are probably other things that don't jive with the type study, but I think I'll just go with it being a type 9.
A couple of statistics:
Length: 20"
Body Width: 3 1/16"
Body Height: 1 5/8"
Iron Width: 2 3/8"
Next time I'll write about restoring this plane.
I have metal Stanley planes with left and right threaded adjuster knobs
ReplyDeleteI don't recall seeing the left-hand vs. right-hand thread addressed in any of the Stanley plane type-studies that I've looked at. Maybe that came about early in the history of metal planes, about the same time as they changed it on transitionals.
DeleteIt is mentioned in my 2 parts illustrated type study, along with may others
ReplyDeleteBob
I just re-looked at those posts. Forgive me for not remembering - I should have consulted them first.
DeleteI’m giving a mild restoration to a No. 29 type 9. It has a “reverse thread.” I think it’s sort of an odd twist on the adjuster, but since it wants to be positioned quite far under the iron, it makes sense to me. If you’re a right handed person, it is easy to adjust the depth with the right thumb. If one does this, moving the iron deeper into the cut translates into turning the adjuster “down” or anti clockwise with the right thumb. To move the iron to a shallower cut, one would move the adjuster “up” or clockwise with the thumb.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment, Stephen. I think my adjuster nut may be just too tight - it is way too difficult to adjust with a single finger. But it's something to look into next time I haul it out for use.
Delete