The chair I'm duplicating was the "head chair" (for lack of a better term) of the set of six and differed from the rest in that it had arms. I got one of the other chairs out of storage to get more information on layout and joinery details.
|
"Head chair" at left (arms are not currently installed) and one of the others |
It turns out that there are more differences between these chairs than just having or not having arms. The head chair's front seat rail and side seat rails are about an inch longer than those for the armless version. And the same applies for the lower rails.
I used the second chair to check out the backward lean of the chair. It turns out that if I put a 1/2" shim under the back legs ...
|
Shim under back leg |
... I get the seat rails parallel to the floor.
|
Seat leveled with 1/2" shim under back legs |
This is important in the layout of the mortises in front and back legs. In the drawings that follow, the bottoms of the front legs are set down 1/2" lower than those of the back legs.
I'll get to the drawings in a minute. I'm not certain what wood was used for these chairs. I scraped some finish off of one of the back legs to see the wood.
|
Not sure what wood this is |
Another area of that leg showed definite evidence of poplar. The curves on the upper leg required wider stock and you can see that a piece was glued on to provide the extra width.
|
The greenish wood is most likely poplar |
I'm going to use poplar for this project, but I'm going to make the the back legs from a single piece. You can see where a crack had formed in the above picture. I hope the use of a single piece of wood will make it stronger.
Before I made the Sellers dining chairs I bought a flip chart like those used in businesses for presentations or meeting. While expensive (over $30!), it has been nice to have paper this size for full scale drawings. It's got vertical and horizontal lines at 1" spacing. This first drawing is a cross section through the seat rails and legs at seat height.
|
Seat rail layout with legs |
I hope you can see enough when you make the photo larger. It is really invaluable to make full scale drawings to play with joinery. Here's a closeup of the lower right corner of the above picture.
|
Front left leg joinery detail |
==========================================================
Gotta stop to ask a question of anyone good enough to respond: do you name the left and right parts of a chair (or table, or cabinet, etc.) from the perspective of someone looking at it from in front of it? Or do you name the sides from the perspective of someone sitting in the chair? For example, sitting in the chair, my right leg would be near the right leg of the chair. That's how I'm naming it.
==========================================================
In the above picture, some of the leg blank with be cut away during shaping. In the picture above, the bit at the right and bottom will be cut away - that's why the reveal is measured from the dotted line. To maximize the tenon length I show them mitered.
The rear leg joinery is much more interesting. Remember the original chair was doweled together. If I try to use M&T, I run into crossing tenons.
|
Rear left leg joinery detail |
This shows why the original builder did something that I thought was interesting. Here is a picture of the rear right leg, rear seat rail (to the right in the picture) and right side seat rail (coming toward the camera). You can see that the the rear rail is higher then the side rail by about 1/2".
|
Right rear leg and seat rail joinery |
This was so they could use dowels without the dowels for the rear rail intersecting with the dowels for the side rail.
|
Rear leg showing offset dowel holes |
Here's how I'm going to handle it with M&T joints. The following picture is a side view of the chair. The red lines show the tenon of the side rail. The rectangle that the tenon intersects is the rear seat rail (end view) and its tenon is shown in pencil dotted line.
|
Side view of chair |
My two tenons will not extend the usual width of a tenon. I'm also going to make my short shoulders just 1/8" to add a little tenon width. Here's a close-up photo.
|
Close-up of side view of rear leg and seat rail joints |
I'll still get 1 1/4" width tenons (rather than the 1 3/4" I normally would have gotten) and they will not interfere with each other.
Another area that will be tricky is the lower rails, which will be joined to the front and rear legs in areas where the legs have a curved shape. Here's the back leg / lower rail detail.
|
Back leg to lower rail joint |
I'm planning to first plane a flat section (see the slanted dotted line) tangent to the curve at the joint location. After the joint has been cut and fitted, I'll complete the shaping, leaving a small flat where the joint is.
The front leg is a different story.
|
Front leg to lower rail joinery |
It would be tough to plane a flat spot at the location of the joint. I think I'll just use the full scale drawing to determine the angle to use for the vertical shoulder of that rail. This should be a real challenge.
It's really interesting how just a bit of experience has made me think of these things BEFORE I start cutting. A great lesson to learn!
Finally, I got the wood for the project: some 5/4 poplar for rails, arms and backrest and some 8/4 poplar for the legs. Mini rant: I can't seem to get full 4/4 wood from the local hardwood dealer. It's planed to about 7/8" and I need 7/8" for my final thickness. I was luck they had 5/4 thickness. Arrgh!
|
Poplar for the project |
I've already started cutting rough blanks for the project pieces. The front legs, all rails and backrest pieces are stickered.
|
Most parts cut to rough dimensions |
Still need to cut another back leg blank and the arm pieces. I'll do that Monday and let them sit for a week.
I'm off Tuesday to southeastern Utah for a week of R&R - probably a lot more recreation than rest. Catch you all on the flip-flop.
I name parts so I understand what is what while I do the build. Been woodworking over 40 years and I still confuse rails and stiles.
ReplyDeleteBut Ralph, how do you name right and left? Perspective of a person sitting in the chair or perspective of the person looking at the chair from in front of it?
DeleteHello Matt,
ReplyDeleteto answer your question about the right naming.
During my apprenticeship I've learned to make make a technical drawing as you would look from in front of the piece and even the top elevation is from in front of it. So I would name it in both cases equally. You are not changing the perspective while changing the elevation.
But at the end is has to work for you. I think I would name it in relation to the front view.
For such a project it is pretty helpful to have full scale drawings. I find it helpful to think through the project before doing it. Often enough the drawing shows challenges you never have thought about before.
Cheers,
Stefan
Thanks for the advise, Stefan. I'm still not sure how I will name the parts, but I am leaning on using the perspective of a person standing and facing the chair.
DeleteAre the lower rails parallel to the seat or parallel to the ground? (the seating being inclined) It would affect your drawing and the angles.
ReplyDeleteIf you have been in the navy, choose port and starboard then it doesn't matter if you are looking to the bow or to the stern (once you have chosen where the bow is, [which I would choose as a person sitting in the chair]);-))
Sylvain
Sylvain, the lower rails are parallel to the seat rails. I agree the angles are different for the lower rails and seat rails, and that is because the lower portion of the rear leg curves back. So the lower rail will have to be slightly longer than the seat rail and the angle from front leg to back leg will be slightly different. These different angles, as well as the angles to fit the leg curves will be tough to handle with only one bevel gauge. I'm planning to use a scrap board with a straight edge to mark all the angles I need, so that I can reset the bevel gauge reasonably accurately.
DeleteEnjoy the vacation in Utah! Southern Utah is a national treasure. Some of the best stargazing in the country can be had at night in Bryce Canyon.
ReplyDeleteHey, Derek. I really love Utah. You're spot on about a national treasure. So many national parks concentrated in one area. And more just over the borders in CO and AZ. I've a buddy from your state (you're in CO, right?) who's hopefully coming to join me for a hike or two this weekend. Should be great.
DeleteI would say the parts are named Left and right based on looking at the chair up front. But then again in aviation, we referred to sitting up front to determine the laft front and right seats...
ReplyDeleteSo I guess it does not matter as long as.. you keep it straight in your head.
What does Peter in his seminal book on chairmaking calls it?
Bob and Rudy
You mean Peter Galbert, right? I don't have that book, but I sure would follow his advise. I think I'll just have to pick one method and stick to it. Gotta get the ol' memory chip going - an iffy prospect at best.
Delete